Difference between revisions of "Talk:5722-JV1"
From MidrangeWiki
Starbuck5250 (talk | contribs) (Link to Java SE 6 for V5R4) |
MrDolomite (talk | contribs) m (__FORCETOC__; section; reply to Java 6 inclusion request) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | __FORCETOC__ | ||
| + | ==Java 6== | ||
Don't know the best way to include Java 6 in this table. | Don't know the best way to include Java 6 in this table. | ||
| Line 4: | Line 6: | ||
I didn't find an easy way to locate a canonical cross reference for all JV1 options. | I didn't find an easy way to locate a canonical cross reference for all JV1 options. | ||
| − | + | --buck | |
| + | *Thanks for the info, I didn't even know Java 6 was available. I took a stab at including the information, so at least if someone googles the PTF or the APAR they will have a start and some jumping off links from the references. And it does suck that there is no good IBM reference for all the versions. I guess that's where the MidrangeWiki can help out. (-: — [[User:MrDolomite|MrDolomite]] • [[User talk:MrDolomite|Talk]] 07:23, 12 November 2007 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:23, 12 November 2007
Contents
Java 6
Don't know the best way to include Java 6 in this table.
Apparently Java PTF Group SF99291 #8 or higher will allow V5R4 systems to load JV1 option 10 (Java 6) Reference: [1] On top of the Java Group PTF, PTF SI26746 will being Java 6 up to version 1.6.0-b105.
I didn't find an easy way to locate a canonical cross reference for all JV1 options. --buck
- Thanks for the info, I didn't even know Java 6 was available. I took a stab at including the information, so at least if someone googles the PTF or the APAR they will have a start and some jumping off links from the references. And it does suck that there is no good IBM reference for all the versions. I guess that's where the MidrangeWiki can help out. (-: — MrDolomite • Talk 07:23, 12 November 2007 (CST)
